Today is a busy day for network neutrality in the U.S. House.
As one committee prepares to vote on a telecom reform bill that
Democrats contend lacks effective network neutrality protections, another
panel opens hearings on the antitrust implications of just such a scenario.
After opening statements late this afternoon, the House Commerce Committee
plans a Wednesday vote on the Communications Opportunity, Promotion and
Efficiency Act of 2006 (COPE).
The centerpiece of COPE is national video franchising for IPTV providers
such as Verizon and AT&T. With the goal of increasing competition in the pay
television market, the proposal enjoys wide support on both sides of the
aisle.
More controversial is network neutrality.
Republicans and Democrats are sharply divided over the best course of action
to ensure that broadband providers — telephone and cable companies — do
not discriminate against delivering content.
Verizon and AT&T have publicly stated they intend to charge content
providers different fees based on bandwidth consumption to access consumers.
Republicans see little problem with this tiered access approach and leave
enforcement of network neutrality to the Federal Communications Commission
(FCC).
Democrats want the FCC’s network neutrality principles, which have no force
of law, turned into statutory law. Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) is expected to
propose an amendment to COPE to do just that.
A similar proposal three weeks ago was handily defeated by the Republicans,
23-8.
Before that vote on Wednesday, though, the House Judiciary Committee plans
to hold a hearing to explore the possible antitrust implications of having
the telephone and cable companies controlling 99 percent of the U.S.
broadband connections.
The Tuesday afternoon hearing is expected to cover a wide range of topics
involving network neutrality, including if access tiering will affect the
competitive landscape and if recent legal and regulatory developments have
affected network neutrality.
Last summer, the Supreme Court upheld in the Brand X decision an FCC ruling
that cable companies do not have to share their lines with competitors. To
put telephone companies on the same competitive footing, the FCC then
exempted DSL from line sharing.
After those two rulings, Verizon and AT&T announced their plans for tiered
access for content providers.
